Hun Sen has been haunted by the death of Gaddafi

Hun Sen is really scary by the death image of Gaddafi. His evil acts since he came to power to nowadays, have always come across his opening eye. After the death of Hok Lundi, Cambodia has not seen day light shooting, but Hun Sen's evil acts and conspiracy in killing many innocent Cambodians during the heyday of Hok Lundi, is still haunting Hun Sen.

Otherwise, Hun Sen wants to proclaim war with younger Cambodians like me and many others; and I can bet with Hun Sen that the power of youths will always win Hun Sen's arrogance, delusion and ruthlessness.

Political Analysis Today;

Watching and listening to this movie clip broadcasted by RFA, I am convinced that what I have predicted about Hun Sen's nervous upset on the death of Gaddafi is real. His tone is worse than Gaddafi, but he is in the stage of better than Gaddafi because his speech and broadcasting on TV is not in a hiding spot.

However, Hun Sen must not be a jerk on the reality of his ascending to power.

First, Hun Sen was installed by Vietnam to play as Vietnam's puppet in their effort to swallow Cambodia. Since Hun Sen ascended to power, his CPP party and comrades are still worshiping 7 January 1979 day which Vietnam nominated them to power to manipulate Cambodian people. This is an evidence of serving foreign interests as well as perpetuating his illegal ascending to power. Gaddafi is better than this because Gaddafi came to power by his own fighting and Gaddafi has never served or be installed by any foreigner.

Second, under Hun Sen's leadership, Cambodia has been privatized everything. National wealth such as natural resources, national budget, foreign loan and other national income is controlled by Hun Sen and his comrades, the CPP. Gaddafi has also privatized his country into his personal wealth.

Third, Gaddafi accepted the reality of his leadership "ruthless is ruthless". Hun Sen is very cowardice. His ruthless is disguised by the physical development, the rule of law and election. Pol Pot explicitly killed the learned and the innocent people. Hun Sen has implicitly amputated the Cambodian people and let them die difficultly. Good lesson from his boss, the communist Vietnam, Hun Sen has controlled Cambodia for more than 26 years with the policy of smart manipulation, cheating and thwarting the progress of human resource in Cambodia.

Fourth, mass media and national budget including foreign loan, Hun Sen has used for his personal body guards and networks to strengthen power, not to develop the nation. Each election is just a show. Hun Sen must dare to show his real skin and color by stopping election in order to proclaim his hero title like "Agga Maha Senapadey Decho Hun Sen" or "the great great hero of protector Hun Sen".

Note that Gaddafi obtained people support in Libya more than Hun Sen in Cambodia, but the failure of Gaddafi has emerged from his internal loyalists, opposition group and international pressure like NATO. Hun Sen will experience the same. Inside the CPP, Hun Sen's strong attachment to power will inevitably create instability within his ring. Outside the party, the Cambodian people have been vomited by the manipulative policy of Hun Sen. Gradually, Cambodian people distrust and disbelieve the lying attitudes of Hun Sen. Internationally, Hun Sen will be strangled by his criminal acts. The Khmer Rouge Tribunal will not except Hun Sen from this independent trial.

Hun Sen is really scary by the death image of Gaddafi. His evil acts since he came to power to nowadays, have always come across his opening eye. After the death of Hok Lundi, Cambodia has not seen day light shooting, but Hun Sen's evil acts and conspiracy in killing many innocent Cambodians during the heyday of Hok Lundi, is still haunting Hun Sen.

Otherwise, Hun Sen wants to proclaim war with younger Cambodians like me and many others; and I can bet with Hun Sen that the power of youths will always win Hun Sen's arrogance, delusion and ruthlessness.

Khmer Young

ប្រផ្នូលអាក្រក់សំរាប់ហ៊ុន សែន boomeraging sign of Hun Sen

Part I

Part II


លោកប្រធានសម រង្ស៊ី មានមេរៀនដ៍ល្អកាលបីលើកមុន ពេលនេះលោកមានការសំរេចចិត្តយ៉ាងមុតមាំ។

ជារឿងដែលគួរអោយគិតសំរាប់កម្ពុជា ដែលដើមឈើងាប់ពីរបីកំណាត់ អាចចោទជាទោសឧក្រិដ្ឋ ចុះការសំឡាប់មនុស្សរាប់រយរាប់ពាន់នាក់របស់ លោកហ៊ុន សែន?

តុលាការលោកហ៊ុន សែន ដែលកាត់ទោស លោកសម រង្ស៊ីថាជាបទឧក្រិដ្ឋព្រោះតែរឿង កំប៉ិកកំប៉ុកគឺជាប្រផ្នូលអាក្រក់ចាំងទៅរកលោកហ៊ុន សែន នូវថ្ងៃអវសាន្តរបស់គាត់។

ពីខ្ញុំខ្មែរយ៉ាំង

Sam Rainsy has learned a good lesson previously in dealing with Hun Sen. This time, his firm determination will be never changed.

It is painful for Cambodians to see that few wood poles can lead to the criminal conviction of Sam Rainsy, how about killing hundreds and thousands of Cambodian people in the hand of Hun Sen?

Hun Sen's court to convict such a trivial act of Sam Rainsy is a boomeranging sign of dooming day of Hun Sen.

KY

Who said Hun Sen government is strong and patriotic?

Political Analysis Today:
by Khmer Young

We will see more communist political tactics employ by Hun Sen government to discredit and demolish the SRP but at the end, Hun Sen will loss face that his power will have no legitimacy because of main opposition leader cannot compete with him in the political ring.

Dear Cambodian Compatriots:

It has been almost two years since 23 September 2010 court of Cambodia sentenced Sam Rainsy 12 years in jail in absentia. Everyone including kids who are still sucking their fingers know that the decision of the court and the involvement of Cambodian government with this court is politically motivated.

However, this card playing by Hun Sen is crucially important. If we idealized about the nature of politics, Hun Sen can play any card for the sake of power like Thomas Hobbs described politics as the use of every means to success and gain the power. But if we idealized this tactic in a Cambodian conscience, it is surely unacceptable and indignant.

Why the game of trial of Sam Rainsy including the two farmers at the border is indignant?

The answer is because Hun Sen and his court are playing the political game of serving foreigner.

In Cambodian constitution clearly stated that every Cambodian people especially government or opposition party obtain full duty to protect the border territory particularly the farmers living along the border. All farmers' complains at the border must be justly cared and solved.

So, in this matter, Hun Sen government is not only abusing his power to serve foreigner, but CPP court is also violating the chapter of Cambodian constitution. Cambodian people and opposition party will sue the court and the Hun Sen government about this violation (if the Cambodian court is puppetic and cannot proceed this verdict, we will also raise this issue to the co-signatories of Paris Peace Agreement who has also participated with the ratification of Cambodian national constitution).

But it is not necessary to go further for that as Hun Sen now is stuck by his own image of puppetic policy and indignant strategy.

• 1. The Cambodian people have seen clearly that the sentence of opposition leader, Sam Rainsy, and those farmers are political trial that serve the Vietnamese interest more than Cambodian interest.
• 2. The political propaganda of Preah Vihear to divert the attention of Cambodian people are not working very well and it has demonstrated Hun Sen government's weakness in handling the issue with Thailand.
• 3. The political propaganda of creating division inside the SRP, the creation of HRP to orchestrate as the main alternative opposition party, the creation of oversea movement (such as the so-called KPPM of SSR) to discredit SRP and their leader, the buy-out and entitlement of SRP members and especially Sam Rainsy are in vain now.

We will see more communist political tactics employ by Hun Sen government to discredit and demolish the SRP but at the end, Hun Sen will loss face that his power will have no legitimacy because of main opposition leader cannot compete with him in the political ring.

And the last card Hun Sen will play is the election mechanism and vote-manipulating and buying. But like I mentioned earlier, Hun Sen is aware about it. He can buy power by fake election/voting, but he can not buy Cambodian people heart. And finally, Hun Sen cannot write a new history of Cambodia for younger Cambodians. In that time, Hun Sen will be inscribed as the traitor and murderer like Pol Pot. Certainly, Pol Pot and Hun Sen including few high ranking figures like Hor Namhong and Keath Chon are former Khmer Rouge leaders.

At the end, Sam Rainsy and SRP party only that truly work for Cambodia and her beloved people. More Hun Sen try to discredit and demolish this party, more we can see SRP become the leading Naga.

Do you understand the "Law of Reaction"?

Khmer Young

Appointing Thaksin to fight with Abhisit: the game of fool leadership of Cambodia

Dear Readers:

But more dangerous than that is the policy of fighting with each other among Khmers under Hun Sen's leadership. Hun Sen is very smart in fighting with his own Khmer race in order to live his life alone in this tiny land of Khmer Empire. Pol Pot has been blamed about that policy. Now it comes to Hun Sen who can mimic this policy correctly. Hun Sen should utilize international laws and Paris Peace Accord to handle with Thailand, not to closely associate with Thaksin and try to push Sam Rainsy to ally with Abhisit without equating Sam Rainsy's self consensus. Hun Sen is good in taming Sam Rainsy but not good in conducting a proper policy to deal with Thailand and Vietnam regarding our beloved border protection.

While I am jumping to analyze the tension situation between Cambodia and Thailand especially the appointment of Thaksin as Hun Sen's economic adviser, I am expecting that my analysis would be one of the contributions for Cambodian nation, and others will not label me as a "traitor" because of my contradict opinion in appointing fugitive former PM Thaksin as Hun Sen's economic adviser.

First, Cambodian government is putting Cambodian people and her nation into a burning fire. Cambodia has deserved full potential to play role of international diplomacy with Thailand, but why Hun Sen chose "crashing strategy" in this time? Cambodia can use international laws and Paris Peace Accord as means to deal with Thailand and also with Vietnam. But why Cambodia government has never paid attention and utilized this legitimate mean? Why Hun Sen appointed Abhisit's rival as personal economic adviser?

In the meantime, Vietnam will gain both giving hand to help Cambodia to fight with Thailand and sell more products to Cambodian people who are more inclined to consumer than as producer behavior. Undeniably, Vietnamese troops will be sent to help their former alliance Hun Sen and the CPP. More gratitude and sympathy will be appeared among CPP's members and some Cambodian people who are drunken of nationalism of Preah Vihear scheme. More than this, Vietnam's secret intervention to support red shirt to fight with yellow shirt will become more intensified and effective as Vietnamese troops can station along border of Cambodia-Thailand.

Second, appointing Thaksin is like slapping incumbent PM Abhisit. The question is that it is good or bad to publicly slap Abhisit like a comedian without having proper plan to deal with the border issue? Or Hun Sen is expecting to get that land back during appointing Thaksin or what? I think it is too fast and very fool to assume that Thaksin, Chavalit and Abhisit are fighting with each other because of border conflict with Cambodia. If we use history as evidence, we have seen that both Thai and Vietnamese have played double standard game to lure Khmers into their trap. Finally their national interests are the most priority. We have had huge evidence in hand that only Khmers who have fought each others in centuries but ceded land to foreigners. Or we can say more Khmers are fighting with each others, more death and land lost occurred; but more Thais and Vietnamese are fighting with each other more progressive and land gained occurred to their nation. With this evidence, has Hun Sen realized this? And what Hun Sen's vision to gain land for Cambodia?

Third, ASEAN and UNs will support Cambodia if Cambodia utilize national laws to deal with Thailand. Thailand has already expressed their concern and disgrace if Cambodia plan to use that international laws especially Paris Peace Agreement to deal with them of border issue. But ASEAN, UNs and international communities dare not support Cambodia in appointing Thaksin as economic adviser to confront with another rival of Thailand. More than this, Abhisit government is more released and happier than before now.

Fourth, appointing Thaksin as Hun Sen's adviser is absolutely appeared as "internal interference". Cambodia should not try to deny this actual allegation. Cambodia has to do more research to seek that when two rivals in their country are fighting with each other, and we gives guns and supplies to one opponent publicly, what act should we name ourselves? Retaliations have happened among this public support to one rival to fight with another. This is not a stage of boxing match or football court. It is lives and blood of innocent people. We have huge evidence to show what happened to such act. America tried/sentenced Saddam to death, may be not because of Saddam's dictatorship and violence, it surely demonstrated that it is because of America who grasped that Saddam supported terrorists to bomb and eliminate America. This happened as well in Cambodia. America supported Lon Nol to topple N. Sihanouk and neglected the atrocity in Cambodia was because of N.Sihanouk who allowed north Vietnamese troops to deliver their force and supplies in Cambodia land to eliminate America. The current situation that Hun Sen has developed his international politics with Thailand might be very similar or the same. Finally Cambodian people will be the victims, not Hun Sen and his colleagues.

Fifth, the most important impression for political analysts and scholars regarding Hun Sen's political move with Thailand is the suspect on "conflict of interest between Vietnam and Thailand" in using their hegemony over Cambodia. There are many failures that Thailand has accepted in securing their friendship with Cambodia. Frequently, more conflict Thailand has made with Cambodia, more loss of interests Thailand has to give away to Vietnam. For instance, the burning of Thai embassy in Phnom Penh is a slap on the face, but in order to normalize its relations with Cambodia, Thailand can accept millions of dollar as compensation/reconstructing their embassy back. In that time, Cambodian police authority have not been charged of neglecting its duty. But Cambodian people money has to use to pay back to Thailand. Cambodia gained some from that burning fever, but Cambodia lost its face in the international stage of diplomacy and million of dollars should be used to reduce Cambodian poverty. Interestingly, Vietnam can increase its hegemony over Cambodia more than Thailand.

In the meantime, Vietnam will gain both giving hand to help Cambodia to fight with Thailand and sell more products to Cambodian people who are more inclined to consumer than as producer behavior. Undeniably, Vietnamese troops will be sent to help their former alliance Hun Sen and the CPP. More gratitude and sympathy will be appeared among CPP's members and some Cambodian people who are drunken of nationalism of Preah Vihear scheme. More than this, Vietnam's secret intervention to support red shirt to fight with yellow shirt will become more intensified and effective as Vietnamese troops can station along border of Cambodia-Thailand.

History has repeated again and again about the fool policy of Cambodian leaders in fighting with Thailand, Vietnam come to support and ceded some land as dowry to Vietnam.

But more dangerous than that is the policy of fighting with each other among Khmers under Hun Sen's leadership. Hun Sen is very smart in fighting with his own Khmer race in order to live his life alone in this tiny land of Khmer Empire. Pol Pot has been blamed about that policy. Now it comes to Hun Sen who can mimic this policy correctly. Hun Sen should utilize international laws and Paris Peace Accord to handle with Thailand, not to closely associate with Thaksin and try to push Sam Rainsy to ally with Abhisit without equating Sam Rainsy's self consensus. Hun Sen is good in taming Sam Rainsy but not good in conducting a proper policy to deal with Thailand and Vietnam regarding our beloved border protection.

What a misfortune gene of Cambodian leaders?

In Solidarity

KY

My Letter to Samdech Ta Norodom Sihanouk

My Letter to Samdech Ta N. Sihanouk,

From analytical analysis's point of view, Samdech Ta is just a Father of himself and remote Cambodian farmers in current Cambodia politics. But in reality, real Samdech Ta's flesh and bone have already been fleshed out by Hun Sen. There is analogy study of Taksin Shinawatra who has tried to de-popularize Thai King Phumibol in the meantime that Hun Sen is trying to de-popularize Khmer King Sihanouk.

It is logical to the concept of political competition that "one cave should exist only one tiger". The cave of political popularity cannot be two in the political arena.

I am really appreciate with the political narrative Samdech Ta recalls during his heyday. Of course, Somdech Ta's information is useful for younger generation like me and other Cambodian friends. Personally, I have learned about Somdech Ta's political career at least from few different sources:

• 1. From the elders who admired Somdech Ta as their hero and extraordinary man in their life span. Some elders boasted themselves about their lucky to see Samdech Ta in person, some boasted themselves about their lucky to have touched Samdech Ta's hand and they felt cold, tender and unforgettable etc. Some elders boasted about their lucky to get white scarf as their precious gift from Samdech Ta. They also showed me this white scarf as it is still kept in their sacred alter to worship. There are many other extraordinary appearances, words and kindness about Samdech Ta.

When I was young, I dream of Samdech Ta's face and kindness as he is named "Samdech Euy". We are his Koun Chao (children & grand children) has to pay respect and be humble to him.

In that time, I was too amazed by the fame and narratives told by the elders.

• 2. I learned about Somdech Ta from school. It is unbelievable that though Samdech Ta sided with Pol Pot to fight against CPP along the Cambodia-Thai border. The text book in that time condemned only Pol Pot, Ieng Sary and Kiev Samphan as the main devils. This hatred propaganda spread entirely and it had always seduced the young adults to go carry guns and kill all those Khmer Rouge leaders. However, I learned at school is not different from the narrative of elders about Samdech Ta. Samdech Ta's figure was always exceptional.

• 3. I learned about Samdech Ta from my own research and reading. Many analytical books describe Samdech Ta in different volumes. However, their intellectual and analytical writing has left some significant remarks about Samdech Ta N. Sihanouk:

• 3.1. He is a king father, the universal monarchy of Cambodians. He is the hero of war, peace and uncertainty. He is also the King, the prime minister, the prisoner, the singer, dancer, movie maker, and blogger. He is also the father of independence as well as the father of Khmer Rouge brutality.

• 3.1. He is the populist and demagogic political leader, the sweetest public speaker, the flip-flopper, the manipulator, the cheater, and the revenged...etc

• 3.2. He has played a great role model as a Cambodian political leader who has always used populist strategy, anti-democratic principle, violence-prone leadership style, and personal-centric decision making etc

• 3.3. Many later Cambodian leaders have used the style of King Father as their role model. For example, current Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen has copied almost every aspect of leadership from Samdech Ta namely using his so-called personal funds to build schools, roads, bridges, hospitals, and temples by inscribing his name and spouse there.

Like elders told me, Samdech Ta is very kind because he gave all his personal property from the smallest gifts to the building of national infrastructures such as schools, roads, hospitals and temples etc. Now, elders have not mentioned this charity activity referring to Samdech Ta anymore, peoples have always admired Prime Minister Hun Sen for his charity activities. So, we can see the Samdech Ta and Prime Minister Hun Sen have used the same strategy to legitimize the power. But what is new for all of us is the political shift changing from Monarchical Charity to Ordinary People Charity (or from King Sihanouk to ordinary Hun Sen).

Will Cambodia live with this leadership style to another unpredictable years or not? Cambodia will be better through this leadership example or not?

Samdech Ta is not different from Hun Sen and his team works who have always used the same political rhetoric. For instance, they said "Pol Pot desired to get Khmer Krom back that why Vietnam attacked them, Cambodian people in abroad are good in speaking but have done nothing to Cambodian nation, the speakers are good in speaking but the doers are still doing to care Cambodia nation", or many other rhetoric which is considered childish rhetoric to fool the Cambodian farmers.

This simple childish rhetoric has been used since the reign of Samdech Ta, and it has been continually used by Lon Nol, Pol Pot, and current Hun Sen.

So, how long this childish rhetoric will be used in Cambodia politics? To be a good Cambodian leaders, do this rhetoric is important or nonsense?

From analytical analysis's point of view, Samdech Ta is just a Father of himself and remote Cambodian farmers in current Cambodia politics. But in reality, real Samdech Ta's flesh and bone have already been fleshed out by Hun Sen. There is analogy study of Taksin Shinawatra who has tried to de-popularize Thai King Phummibol in the meantime that Hun Sen is trying to de-popularize Khmer King Sihanouk.

It is logical to the concept of political competition that "one cave should exist only one tiger". The cave of political popularity cannot be two in the political arena.

But Thaksin is facing difficult challenge, while Hun Sen is freely riding on his victorious seat.

Samdech Ta can spend his last breath to favor whoever has given him a shade as part of Cambodian practice, paying gratitude is authentic. But Samdech Ta has also faced the reality that this shade is not a genuine shade for him any more.

I wish Samdech Ta can see this reality and do something meaningful for his last blink in this world.

KY

Sam Rainsy, Hun Sen, NEC, and Political Game in Cambodia

Sam Rainsy has been so brave to play politics in wild environment of Cambodia. In Cambodia, I guarantee, if we don't have a strong and brave opposition leader like Sam Rainsy, Cambodia will be easily falling into absolute dictatorship. Now, Cambodia is led by absolutist as well, but it is better because there is still having opposition party.

However, Sam Rainsy's political rhetoric should be adjusted and spoken in a more productive way, don't follow or imitate Hun Sen's unproductive political rhetoric.

Sam Rainsy perceived well that NEC's lawsuit against him is just politically oriented one. And he stated several times that those amount of money is not huge for him as he has always donated for social charity more than that. But he has waited to see that how NEC will play its neutral role. So, this case shows us again, the evidence that, NEC is not neutral at all.

Second thing is the major voice of assembly. Assembly exists only physical appearance, but inside that assembly power is controlled by one-man absolutist. Hun Sen intimidated Sam Rainsy and assembly followed Hun Sen's like a very clever dog.

Like I mentioned previously, Cambodia's political game of election and assembly are just the "clown" of Hun Sen's power thirst. It is not better off to develop democracy at all. Hun Sen himself has no willingness to develop anything better if his own power thirst is not facilitated for him. Of course, only Hun Sen and his cronies who want Cambodia to move in this way. There are many other CPP's elites, opposition parties, and Cambodian peoples who are wanting change, and accruing genuine democracy development for future Cambodia.

Currently, major public praise Hun Sen for his credits of stopping KR, war and facing with territorial conflict with Thailand, but if this theory shows something truth about the trick of Hun Sen behind these beliefs, you might think in opposite way. I don't tell you that truth, you can figure out by your own.

KY